I note that the prolifically incompetent "mathematician" Eugene Terrell has recently submitted a couple of new Inernet-Drafts on the topic of being able to fit more than 128 bits of numbers into 32 bits of space. Go to http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/index-t.html and look at draft-terrell-* ...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 21:16 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 21:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 21:47 (UTC)A true demonstration of the proverb 'A little knowledge is a dangerous thing'. Like most kooks, his inability to produce comprehensible English is the biggest defense for his ideas — before you can begin to disprove them, you have to try to work out what he's actually saying.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 22:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 22:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 23:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 09:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 09:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 12:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 07:37 (UTC)I hadn't seen that before...
Date: 2006-05-05 11:43 (UTC)The crackpot index... This is a revolutionary contribution to *ahem* freeform scientific debate. Shame there's no metric for spelling errors and innovative grammar.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 12:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-06 08:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-06 08:27 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-06 11:04 (UTC)