Millennium Post
2006-01-31 22:01![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/connect/pip/dk7o2/
I just heard a pretty amazing programme about technology and the postal service. The thing that struck me was the way they have mechanized bulk sorting of letters. There are 73 major sorting centres in Britain which between them have 200-300 letter sorting machines, which do the obvious jobs of working out the letter's orientation and photographing it for OCR. (Really fast - 30,000 items per hour per machine.) What surprised me is that the OCR is not done on site, but instead the photos are transmitted over the post office's data network to a single centralized data centre which contains all the clever computers. Of course they aren't so clever that they can deal with all letters, so - second surprise - unrecognized letters are handled by sending the images to offices full of people who type in post codes all day.
No significant sorting intelligence is on the same site as the sorting machines.
Hmm, perhaps this is the manufacturer of the machines: http://www.abprecision.co.uk/businessunits/hsp/postalservices.htm
And perhaps this is a press release about the data centres: http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=59114
I just heard a pretty amazing programme about technology and the postal service. The thing that struck me was the way they have mechanized bulk sorting of letters. There are 73 major sorting centres in Britain which between them have 200-300 letter sorting machines, which do the obvious jobs of working out the letter's orientation and photographing it for OCR. (Really fast - 30,000 items per hour per machine.) What surprised me is that the OCR is not done on site, but instead the photos are transmitted over the post office's data network to a single centralized data centre which contains all the clever computers. Of course they aren't so clever that they can deal with all letters, so - second surprise - unrecognized letters are handled by sending the images to offices full of people who type in post codes all day.
No significant sorting intelligence is on the same site as the sorting machines.
Hmm, perhaps this is the manufacturer of the machines: http://www.abprecision.co.uk/businessunits/hsp/postalservices.htm
And perhaps this is a press release about the data centres: http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=59114
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 22:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 23:00 (UTC)Anything reaching the second stage too early can be routed back to the holding stage.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 23:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 00:15 (UTC)I can see a variety of possible solutions, I'm just interested in what actually happens.
Possible solutions include:
- Rescan letters in the holding loop repeatedly and match up the images
- Treat the holding loop like a TCP window so that you can identify letters in it by position and only need to remove letters from the head
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 22:38 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 12:49 (UTC)They still prominently bore my handwriting saying "not at this address". I assume the machine read the bar-code print things.
Yay, mechanisation.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 12:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 13:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 13:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 17:21 (UTC)In Australia, envelopes are almost universally printed with four little light-orange boxes for the postcode, to make the OCR's job even easier. I'm surprised they don't push for that here.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 12:58 (UTC)<Vernor Vinge>Aah! Zipheads!</Vernor Vinge>