(no subject)
2005-01-16 23:16![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fanfhttp://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1105614487492&call_pageid=970599119419
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1427660,00.html
I'd like to see them try this in Cambridge, if only because the clutter on the streets in the city centre is incredibly ugly. This is assuming, of course, that it has the right effect on taxi drivers and other cretins. But given that our councils have very old-fashioned and rules-bound approaches to road design, I don't have much hope.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1427660,00.html
I'd like to see them try this in Cambridge, if only because the clutter on the streets in the city centre is incredibly ugly. This is assuming, of course, that it has the right effect on taxi drivers and other cretins. But given that our councils have very old-fashioned and rules-bound approaches to road design, I don't have much hope.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 15:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 15:12 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 15:27 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 15:42 (UTC)(b) Because it severely impacts the usability of the road for non-pedestrians. As I said, it effectively provides a pedestrianised road, whereas the goal appears to be maintaining general purpose use.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 20:00 (UTC)But then, the same can be observed on the M25 ...